Dematerialization of Architecture The history of discourses has been developed for centuries, and architecture have entered a phase of re-evaluation. Because of the prevalent technology and media of
Dematerialization of Architecture The history of discourses has been developed for centuries, and architecture have entered a phase of re-evaluation. Because of the prevalent technology and media of
(1) (1964), (2004), (Cambridge: (New (Princeton (Summer (Wiley (www.field-journal.org), - 1. 114-21. 19-55. 2. 2002), 2005). 2008), 2011), 2013). 28 3. 4. 5. 6. 6: 7-99. 7. 8 91-101. Academy: Age Antoine Architectural Architecture Architectures Art Atmosphere Audiences Beatriz Because Belknap Benjamin, Between Bibliography: But Colin Colomina, Construction Critical Diller, Doors Elizabeth Eyes Fischer, Gannon, Harvard He Here How However, I,” Immersive In It John Juhani Last Light Literal Ltd, Material Materiality Materiality,” Mechanical Merleau-Ponty’s Monacelli New Ole PRAXIS Pallasmaa, Part Perspecta Phenomenal, Photographers Picon, Plasma’s Presence, Press Press, Reader Reading Reproduction, Robert Rowe Senses, Skin. Skin: Slutzky, Sons Spaces Technologies://New The This Todd Towards Towers University, Virtual: W. Walter We Wiley Windows Work York: a abstract advantages agency,” allows ambiguous an and angle another answer apply architecture architecture. architecture? are argues at automatized, autonomy available away. back be because become becomes been between biased big blinded body book: brick brown building built but can cannot capture centre centuries, coating confuse construction contemporary contradicts could creation curtain definition degraded dematerialized density, depict designers developed developments discourses discovered discovering dispensable. disregarding disrupted dissolved does each ed. elasticity, encourages enervated entered even everything exaggerated except excessive exciting experience experiential eyes facade. fading five flat for four fragile frame from get gigantic go grow habitat. hardly has have heavy high highly his history hollow hours human ideas. identity illusions. images imitate immense importance impression. in individual inflation intangible interpret invisible is it. its just labyrinth least, limited. live log lost manner. mapping material material. materiality. materials matter matters. means mechanism media metal moment. more most multi-sensory new no not o object obscure, obsession obstacle of on one open. or other our out over perceiving phase philosophy, photography physical picture piece pixelated practice. prevalent profound program, project properties, proportion. purely qualities quantitative rare re-evaluation. reaffirmed recklessly reflective relationship rendering renderings, republished resulted same scale see seeking selectively sensation shiny shiny; simplify simulation six solid somehow space space, specific stainless static; steel stiffness, structure subjective, substituting surface takes tangible technology that the their theory. there they thickness, this those three tiling time. to too took traditional trust truth, twDematerialization two understanding up. us use veneer virtual visible visual visualization. vol.1 walk wall. wallpaper, we whole with within wood world, writing yet ‘texture’ “Architecture “Transparency:
Dematerialization of Architecture
The history of discourses has been developed for centuries, and architecture have entered a phase of re-evaluation. Because of the prevalent technology and media of creation in the virtual world, contemporary architecture is dematerialized to be images and abstract ideas. The definition of architecture has become even more subjective, obscure, ambiguous and limited.
We took advantages from photography and the technology of visualization. But the excessive trust on the visual sensation has somehow blinded our