& &mod=Publications::Article&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&SiteID=47341 (1) (1994) (1994). (2) (2010) (2010). (2010, (3) (Gómez-Mejía, (January, (Kondrasuk, (Staff (p. - 1 1) 1, 1. 11(1), 11, 12, 2 2) 2, 2. 2000 2010 2010), 2010). 2012 28). 28-34 3 3) 3. 341 4 4) 4. 5) 59(2), 7 76 8383454426DA53DD03044F159BD&tier=4&id=5C3C747F192D44528E2412F439748CA7 A Academy Advanced America’s An Appraisal April Attendance: Attitude: Balkin, Bretz Bretz, Buzzle.com, Cardy, Custom D., Dependability Describe Description. EVALUATION Edition Employee Evaluating For GENERAL Grooming: Grote Gómez-Mejía, HCS HRM Hall. However, Human Identify Improve In It J. JOB January). Job Journal, Jr. Kondrasuk, L., Management Managers, Managing N. NJ: Number Once Others PA PA, PA. Performance Phoenix Phoenix, Prentice Problem Problems R. R.D., Rate Read Recruitment References Research Resources Retention Retention, Retrieved River, S. SAM SPECIFIC Saddle So, Spring, Staff Standards Strategic Supervisors The Thomas Thomas, Thus, Total University Upper Volume When Workers [University a abilities about acceptable accuracy accuracy. acted actions actively activity. adding agenda. agents amount an and and, another any anything appraisal appraisal, appraisal: appraisals appraisals, appraisals: appraisal—An approach appropriately are area; areas as assess assessing at average avoid based be because been behavior benefits best better better, both business by by: can careers categories, category, changes clarifying combination commitments common, companies companies. compensation, conduct conducted conducted, connected constituencies consultation context contrast, costs critical. deadly demotions, design, develop developing did directly discussion diseases” dislike disliked divide do don't don’t eBook]. each echoed effectively effectiveness effects efficient either else employee employee. employees employees, employee’s encouraged endeavor” equal essential evaluate evaluating evaluation evaluations, even example, excel, failure fear feedback firm firms focus focusing followed for form form. format, forms from function functions general give given goal goals goals. has have hear” help helping her hiring, his hopes hospital how http://www.buzzle.com/articles/employee-performance-appraisal-ideal-system.html. http://www.managementresources.com/ME2/Sites/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Per-Pro/Performance-Appraisal-and-Standards.html#ixzz29n01XLsF https://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&hid=102&sid=0a0268f2-90c1-4e8d-a87a-f33fda25042e%40sessionmgr112 human ideal identification important important, improve improve, improve. improvement improvement. improving in indirectly individual influence interest intervals, into involved involving is it items it’s job keep key know largely largest lecture level like list lives loathing” main make management manager managers managers, manager’s maximization may measurement messages, months more more: most motivated motivated. negative neither neither’s no nor not notice number of on one one-way or organization organizations other out over overall own participants passive pay peak people perceptions performance performance, performance. performing perspective plan points points. political poor positive practice preset probably problem. problems problems. process process. process: processes, productivity. promotions, properly, provide purpose raise rarely rating ratings rational receive receive. reduced regular related relative remained require resource resources resources, results rewards said say score scored scores seems sees serve sessions set setting shocking show showing simply six skills solicited staff standards standards. state subordinates subordinates' suggestions supervisor supervisors supervisor’s system. take taking tells tend terminations than that the their there these they this though time timing, to training, transfers, try two-way typically ultimately, uncommitted unsatisfactory upon, use usually utility, utilizing valuable value very views was website well where which who will with work worker workers workers’ written year years your “both “has “not “one •