& (1982). (2007). (2009). (2010, (2011, (2nd (3rd (4th (Banks, (Cyndi (NKJV) (Rae, (Sam (or (p.280) (p.74) (p.75) (p.p. (www.fbi.gov) (www.policeone.com) . 15). 16). 17) 1767 1961 2, 2007) 2009 2009) 2010, 2011/focus-on-ethics 2014, 280-281) 2:8 3, 47 A After An Aristotle As Assn. B. Banks, Bender Bible: Biblical Bulletin Bureau Burglaries C. CA: Career Chiefs Choices, Christ Christ.” Christian City’s Colossians Company Criminal D. Denver Denver’s Deontological Deontological/Formalism Department Eldridge, Enforcement. Ethics Ethics, Exposé FBI FBI- February Federal Fitch, Focus For God God. God’s Grand Holy How If In Inc. International Introduction Investigation, Is It It’s James June Justice Justice, King L. Law MI: Marked Matthew May Moral NJ: Nashville, Nelson. New Newark, Now Oaks, October). Plato Police PoliceOne.com PoliceOne.com. Post Practice Proponents Publications Rae, Rapids, Rea References Rethinking Retrieved S. Sage Search Shame’ Situational Some Soorya’s Souryal, Spirit TN: That The Theory There These They This Thomas Thousand Truth Unfortunately, Utilitarianism Version. Virtue Whearley, You Zondervan. [ a ability about absolutes abuse academies academy accomplish according across act action action” acts acts. actualizing against agencies alcoholism all allegiance. alone along also always an and and, anger, answer anticipated any appeal apples” application are are. argue argued, arises around article as asked, at attended authority authority, automatically background badges balance based be became because because, become becoming before behavior being believed benefit benefits, benefits. best better better. bitterness blaming book book, born bottom breakdown breakdown. brought built burglaries burglaries, but by called can candidates cannot can’t captive carried cause causes certain challenges. changes chaos character. choice choices choices, choices. chooses choosing churches, circumstances city claim code command commands committing communities, community comprised concept concerning confidence consequences consequences. consequentialist consider constraints. contend contrast contriving corrupt could course cracks” crime. crimes. curriculum daily damage.” deceptive decision decision-making decisions definable defined demonstrate deontological deontologically department department. departmental departments’ department’s depends desirable despite determine determines develop development did difference difficult dilemma. dilemmas discipline discussions, divorce, do do, doctrine does doing done double earth. easy ed.). education efforts elemental else’s emphasis end end, endeavor ended, enforcement entire entirely environment ethic ethical ethics ethics, even every evidence example exemplary exhibit expected explain extensive face faced facing fact; fails families, few field finding first five focuses follow for force forces forget formal found four friends. from function gave given gives giving glory going good goodness greater greed, growing guide guidelines guiding habit; handles happen? happiness. harm harmful has hatred have he heaven high hired. history hollow how http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/october- http://www.policeone.com/patrol- human hurt if illegal immediately immoral in in. incidents include increase increased incredible influence informal injustices, inline innocent instances instead insufficient intention interesting interpretation interviewing into investigations involved involves is isolated issues issues/articles/3804919-Situational-ethics-and-the-moral-chaos-of-modern-policing/ it its itself. itself.”(p.14) job. just justification justify kind known lack largely law laws lead leading learned life life. lifelong line live lives look loss lust made made, major make makes making managed many matter may means, means. misbehave misconduct. models modern moral morality more morning most much must nation need needed needs no not number obedience observers obvious occur occurred occurs of offers, officer officer; officers officers. officer’s on one ones online only opportunists or order oriented original other otherwise out out, outweigh overall own p. part pay peer people person person: personnel. persons perspective perspective, perspective. perspectives philosophy, place pledge point pointed points police police-burglars policing. policy, polygraph possessing possible possibly, potential power practice. prevent principles.” prior prison. problem problems process produces profession profiles program, promiscuity, prone property provide psychological public pure pursuit quality question rate rather reason reasons recite recruiting recruits reflection. refrain regarded remain remember reorganization repair reprint restore result right rightly, rightness role rules, safecrackers. said said. same say: scandal scandal-ridden scandalous schools sets shakeup shame, she shifts should shows situation. six skills. slaves social solely someone something sometimes spend spiritual staff. standard states steps sterling still strict stripped strong struggles, submission substantial succumb such sufficient suicide. supervision supervisors sweeping t taken takes teachers temptations tend test than that the their them them. then theories theories, theorists theory there therefore these they thing things thins this this, thorough those thoughtful three through to took tradition train training training, transforming two understand undertaking unethical unethical), unlikely unrest up upon us,” used utilitarian, utilitarianism values values. variously verse very view virtue virtuous wanting was way way, weigh went were what whatever when which while who whom widespread will with without wo words) work world would wrong wrong, wrong. wrongdoing, wrongness year you – ‘Year “All “See “The “bad “slip “such “that