law and morality
law and morality
(?) (ambition) (crime (custom) (faith) (god (heliaia) (if (in (means (monarchy) (part (small (what 1. 2. 3. = Aeschines Agon: As Athenians Athens Average Basic Bound Can’t Character David Democracy Describes Disenfranchisement: Emulation: Enmity: Envy: Evaluating Everyone Evidence: Fist Foreign Friendship Gossip Handful Hubris Hubrisitic Hubristai: I If In Is It Jero-sum No Norms Obligation People Pick Piety: Power Practice Raise Retaliating Seeking Since Small Society Sophosyne: Sue Syco Sycophancy: The There This Threat: Topoi: Trial Trial: Tyrant: Very Vice: Virtue: Who Will You a abusive act against agree all always an ancient and another anticipates anyone are are: arguing as assessment: at attacked? average avoid avoiding back balance based basically be because become behind benefit benefits best better blood both brawls, bring broader brought bullies bully, bully. but by call can can’t care carry central certain character character, characteristically choose citizen citizens city city) city, closed cohen comes committee competition concept, conflict conflict, considered constant contact convincing court court) courts criminal cross crown crucial day decide decided decides defend democracy deserves, desire did didn’t different different, direct disadvantage dishonorable disputes does doesn’t doing don’t down e each eachother eager else endless enemy enemy” enough envious establish everyone evidence examination excessively fact facts fair families families, feud feud. fight fight, fighters fights, find five for force four friend friend, friends, from fued? game, game: get gets, give go gods. going good harm has have he help hides hides, him, his honor honor. honorable honour how hubris hubris) hubris, hugely humility if important important, in initiated into invade invisible, is isolated, it its job join judgement jury just keep kept kids king known lack law law, laws legal lied, life) like liking line look lot make making many matter matter? me, mean men moderation modern morality morals more motivated mountain much much, necessarily, need no nobility not number of official on on, one onlaw only open opportunity, order origin other outside own own, paints people people, people. person person, person’s perspective, persuades persuasion) picture played police policy, political power power, powerful praised private profession promoted prose prosecution protect, protected protects public put recognize recognized regularly resolve result retaliate revenge rich riches role rule rules scenes, service sessions sharp short side sides situation six size slander so society some someone someone, someones something speech, standard state state, state? step stone stop strong, stronger sue suits sycophancy system take takes team terrorizing than that that, that’s the their them themselves then theory) there these they three times, to today, together, too topics, traditional training trial tricks truth try two unwritten, up using values very vice, vicious virtue virtue, vote want wanted warriors, was way we weaker wealthy well were western what which who will willing win with witness, worked, working worse would you you) you, young your you’re “help “loser”
law and morality
1. The king decides it (monarchy)
2. Handful of rich people decide in a closed committee 3. Democracy (small number of rich people, not everyone necessarily, but broader number of people Athens known as a democracy
Average citizen played a central role in making the laws what they are There are many court sessions regularly (heliaia)
Democracy comes from the origin of western
David cohen paints a hugely different picture
Describes the society as a constant blood feud
Threat: will democracy become a blood fued? Will public become a terrorizing state? There is no official state in the way we recognize them today, there is no police to go to Everyone was basically defend themselves