The Drinking Age & States’ Rights States should be allowed to make their own drinking laws because the Constitution does not state that this is a right given to the federal government and therefor
The Drinking Age & States’ Rights States should be allowed to make their own drinking laws because the Constitution does not state that this is a right given to the federal government and therefor
"Four "Highway "History "Introduction." "Minimum "South "The & (1987) (1987)) (Hedlund). (Highway (LaFaive). (MADD). (MLDA) (ProCon.org), (Resnick). (South (“The 10 14 15 158 16 18.4 190 1933, 1970, 1984 1984, 1993. 2001. 2010. 2014. 2016. 2017. 203 24.4 26th 483 5, 6 A&E Act Age Alcohol-Impaired Amendment Amendment, Amendment." Amendment”) Are As Atlantic Atlantic. Brian, Center Chicago-Kent Cited College Company, Congress Constitution Constitutional Countries." Court, D. D., DEPARTMENT Dakota December Determine Dole Dole). Dole, Dole." Drinking Drivers. Emma Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia. F. Feb. Fewer Free Fund) Fund, Fund." Funding G. Government H., Hedlund, Held Highway History.com History.com. Hostage." IIT In Indian It Itself." J. Jan. Judge July LaFaive, Law. Lawrence Legal Likewise, MADD. MLDA MLDAs Mackinac Mar. May Media Michael Minimum National Networks, OF Oyez. O’Connor Policy. Preusser. Prior ProCon.org, Public R. Reed. Rep. Resnick, Rights Roller. Sept. Similarly, South Speaks Staff. State's States States’ Supreme TRANSPORTATION, Television The There They This Times Trust Twenty-first U.S. Ulmer, United Vietnam W. War, Web. What When Whether Why Wikipedia Wikipedia, With Works Young a about absence accordingly. account, act actual actually addition adequately adults affect age alcohol alignment all all. allowed although amendment amendment, among amount amount. an and and, another, any anything appropriate are area area” arguing argument around as at away based be because been being believe believed belongs but by can case case, category centered cents changing choice choose choosing classify clause clause, clearly climate coercive come commerce commerce. commodities concession concluded condition conditions considered considered, considering constituents constituents. construction. consumption continue contributors. control cooperate could could. couldn’t country court covered crossover crucial decide. decided deciding decision demonstrates denied deny diesel different disprove dissenting do do, does dollars done drafted drink. drinking driving drunk due each easy eighteen eighteen, eighteenth eighties, either, enforceable era especially eventually ever excise explicitly fact fact, factor fair falls fatalities federal federalism federally fight first fiscal five following for forced foreign four from fuel function function, fund fund, funds gain gallon gasoline get given gives going good government governments governments. had has have held highest highway highways his history hostage. how however, however. hundred if implementation implied important importantly, imposed in increased independently inherent instituted intact. interstate into involved. is issue issue, it its job judge jurisdiction just justify keep keeping knew knows last law law. laws left legal legislate legislated legislating legislation less like likely liquor lives local logically looked loopholes losing lower lowered lowering make makes making mandated manipulative many matter means mentioned might minimum misreading money more must nation. nations, necessary need needing never new no not not, note nothing now nowadays of on one oneThe only operated opinion option or other own part pass per percent percent. place. point, policy post-prohibition power power, power. prohibition prohibition, protected. protecting punished purpose pursue question raise rather realization reason reasonably receives reduction reflect refusal refused regulate regulates regulator related relevant repealed requirements right right, rightfully rights risk role said sale sanctions sanctions, saved say seen sense serve set seventies several should shows similar simply situations six sixties so so. sold spending state stated states states, state’s strictest strong succeeded supreme switch system taken takes taking tax taxes” technically ten tenth than that the their them there therefore, these they this three through to to. transportation tribes”, truly try twenty-first twenty-one twenty-one, twenty-one. twenty-sixth twice two unable unconstitutional under unduly unnecessary, until up up-to-date upheld using v. vastly version violated vote voting was were what whatever when whether which with within without world would wrong years, years. yet young § – “a “force “to
The Drinking Age & States’ Rights
States should be allowed to make their own drinking laws because the Constitution does not state that this is a right given to the federal government and therefore, it rightfully belongs to the state governments. This does not classify as an inherent power because Congress has no reason to believe that these laws are necessary for the government to function, especially considering that the United States has only instituted a MLDA – minimum legal drinking age – in the last hundred years. In fact, the history of MLDAs demonstrates how states have been