%) & (1.56) (1926).’The (1948). (1969a). (1980). (1998) (1998). (2005) (60 (Pareto’s (Potter (Vickery, (and (concentrated). (consider (contrary (identification (mainly (n=2). (scattered) . 1 1) 1.9 1/ 1/6 1/9 1/n2 1/na 10 100 100/102 100/82=2 100/92=1(1.23) 11 133 147-242. 15-22. 155 16(12): 1852Words 1926 1934 1948). 1988). 1: 2 2) 2,653 2. 2005, 224(5223), 225, 25 258 26, 265 293 3 3) 317-324. 326 404 42(3), 429 45, 499 5 5(1), 500” 59 8 9 9, 953-956. = =1 =C/ A A. Abstracts. Academy Alfred Application Arts As Authors B. BIBLIOMETRIC Basu, Bensman, Bibliometrics Bradford Bradford’s Brookes, C C. C=1 Chemical Citation Crosby Disciplinary Documentation, Documentation. Example Experimental Garfield’s Geographical He Heine Hjorland Hjorland, Holding How However However, Humanities Idea If In Index Index, Indexes. Inefficient Information International It J. James Journal Journals Joyce’s LAWS LSU Law Laws Lexical Library Linguistic Lockwood. London: Lotka Lotka’s More Nature, Nicolaisen No Number One Optimization Or Other Project REFERENCES Redesign Researchers Resources S. S.J. Samuel Say Science Sciences Scientific Semantic Serials Services, So Social Some Subject Technical That The Theoretical There They This Though Ulysses.” Umstatter, Washington When Where Wilder, X Xn, XnY Y Zipf Zipf’s Zipf”s a about according accurate, across actual after again, all also always amount an analysis and another any application applications approximate approximately approximation are are: areas article article. articles articles, articles. articles: as assume at authors authors, available average based be because become been behavior. being believed best between bibliography bibliometric bibliometrics body borders. both broad but by can carefully certain choose circumstances citations. claim claim. claimed collection common commonly communicated concepts concerns conducting consensus considered considered, considering constant constant. constants constraints. contained containing contexts. contribute contributing contribution contribution, contributions conventions, core counted counted. covering covers cultural cultures databases databases. debated. decisions decreasing degree depending describe described describes determine determining difference different diffusion diminishing discipline-specific. disciplines disciplines, discovered discusses). distribution distribution. distributions divided document documenting documents. does dominant dominates each empirical epistemologies equal equals equation equipment equivalent estimates etc. evaluation even exact examined example example, example: exercise. exists explained? exponentially expressed extending extremely f few few’ field field. fields fields). fields, fighter first first, five fixed for form formula formulary formulated formulation forum found foundation four frequency frequency, frequent frequent. function general geographical, geophysics, given graphical greater guideline has have he high higher himself his history how hundredth ideas ideas, identical identified if illustrated important in included increases, indexers. individual influence information interdisciplinary, into investigation involved( is is: issues issues: it items its itself journal journals journals, journals. journals’) k kills. kinds knowledge, knowledge. known laboratories languages large last later law law. laws laws. least lengthy less librarians libraries library like list literature literature. macro-sociological main majority make makes making many market: mathematical mathematically matter may method methods military minority misunderstood more most much multiplied n n2. n:n2. n=2: na national ne nearly necessary need never next nine non-quantitative norms, not number number, oBibliometric observation occurred occurrence. occurring of often on on. one one-third one. only open, operationalizations operationalized operationalizing or order organization organizational orientation originally other over paper papers. parts pattern patterns perfect perhaps period period, pilot place places plainly, play power predict preparation): presents principle) probability probable problem. problematic produce produces producing production productive productivity productivity, productivity’. proportional provided psychology, publication publications, publish published publishing qualitative quality quality’ quantitative question r rank rather ratio ratios reception references referred reflect reflecting regarded regarding relation relationship relative relatively relevant represent require research research, researched result. returns role rule r×f said same says: scatter, scattered scattering scattering, scattering. scattering: science science. scientific search second second, seen seen, select selected selecting selection sense sensitive serves should showed single six small so social some sometimes speaking, special specific specified states statistical statistically statistics still strictly studied studies studying subject subject, subjects subjects. subsequent such table task task, tenth text text, text. texts texts. than that the their them then there these they third third, third. this those three thumb thus time times times, titles to took total trace true: two two. type unclear under underlying understood use used useful users). utilizes vague valuable variation verbal verified. very view view. vital was way ways we what when where whether which while who will winning with within word word, words words, words: works. world. would write writer, writer. writers writing written you zone zone, zones zones. ¼ ‘a’) ‘core ‘less ‘real’ ‘subjects’ ‘subject’ ‘the “discrete “list