OVERVIEW OF THE ENOLA GAY CONTROVERSY HISTORY ESSAY  In Stuart’s Representation: Cultural Representation & Signifying Practices, the author analyzes the definition of “representation” in vario   3300W

OVERVIEW OF THE ENOLA GAY CONTROVERSY HISTORY ESSAY  In Stuart’s Representation: Cultural Representation & Signifying Practices, the author analyzes the definition of “representation” in vario   3300W

$0.69
Add To Cart

OVERVIEW OF THE ENOLA GAY CONTROVERSY HISTORY ESSAY     3300W

The term “History Wars” was coined in the United States in 1994 [1] . It was based on the controversy over how history should be represented for the decision of dropping an atomic bomb on Japan when the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum drafted an exhibit entitled “The Crossroads: The End of World War II, the Atomic Bomb and the Cold War” around the refurbished Enola Gay to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the end of the war in 1995. This controversy centred around the failed 1995 Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum’s exhibit of the Enola Gay, which intended to examine intersection the end of World War II beginning with the dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Along that process, various stakeholders in the representation of this historical event were embroiled including Smithsonian curators, veterans such as the Air Force Association and the American Legion, members of the United States Congress, academic historians, media, American public and even the Japanese.

As early as in 1988, Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum (NASM) announced that they