& (16th (1998). (1999), (1999). (2008). (2011). (2014). (2015), (2015). (2016). (Federal (Garrett, (Mallor, (Nolo, (Sacks, (The 1051-1093. 2008). 2011). 2014). 2016). 467-491. 51(2), 69(8), 77(3), 9-10+. A. A., According Barnes, Bowers, Business C. Care Co. Communications Conclusion Corporation Corporation, Criminal D. Dance, Does Education, Employee Employee? Employees Employer Employers Ethical Evidence F.N.P.-B.C. Federal Fordham Garrett, H, H. Health If In Intentional Irrefutable It J. J., Journal Journal). Journal, L. LAW_Torts Langvardy, Law Liability Linda M.S.N., Mallor, Manager). Manager. McConnell McConnell, McGraw-Hill/Irwin NOLO. NY. Need Negligent New Nowak Nowak, Obligation Owed P. Ph.D., Physical Potential R. Recreation References Retrieved Review, S. Sacks, Sawyer, Sex Sexual T. T., The There Things This Torts Torts. When While XYZ York, a absolute, absolutes” accountable act act. action actions actions. activities. acts. actually agents all allow an and another any apple.” appropriate are areas as assault assault, assaults at attack avoiding aware battery be because been benefit bite but by can candidate cautious charges civil clear comes commitment committed companies company complaints corrective could court, court. court; crime criminal damages danger danger, deal deserve details diligence distress do does doi:10.1097/HCM.0000000000000041 doubt. due during duty ed.). emotional employee employee's employee. employees employees, employees? employee’s employer employer. employers employer’s employment enough? ensure environment ethical evidence explain face faced fail failure fall few first follow following for form found from given guidelines handled has have held hire hire, hires. hiring hiring. hours. how however http://search.proquest.com/docview/213195474?accountid=458 http://search.proquest.com/docview/215768182?accountid=458 http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/employer-liability-employees-bad-acts-29638.html if important in incident injured injury intentional into investigating, investigation irrefutable is issues issues. it job keep know law law, laws leave liability liable liable. may means measures. member might more most must need negligent no not not, obligation obligations occur occurred occurred. of on one online only or organization other others. owe parties past. policies pose poses possible potential present presented, presented. prevent preventive priority problems product proof proper protect provide public question question. reasonable receive regardless regular remedial report required required. responsible retaining retention retraining rules safe safe, safety safety, scenario, scenarios screening second sexual should simple site. some still stop such sued suit supervision supervision. suspicion take taken that the their theory there these they to top tort torts understand used violent was well what when while who with work working workplace. “In “the