& (1) (2) (2014) (2014). (Cheeseman, (EEOC) (Glenza, (Hananel, (who 10th 13 17 2012. 2014). 2014, 2018. 2019), 543). 544). 8th A ANALYSIS: Abercrombie Abercrombie) Abercrombie’s According After American At Bhasin, Bias’ Bookshelf. Business CONCLUSION: Cases. Cheeseman, Coast Commission Cooke Court Did Discrimination EEOC East Edition. Elauf Elauf, Elauf’s Employment Equal FACTS: Fitch Fitch, For Glenza, Hananel, Hear Henry Hijab Hijab. Housing However ISSUE: In J. K. Kids LAW_ Law. Learning Look, Muslim Muslim, Oklahoma, Opportunity Pearson Preppy-All R. RULE: References Religious Retrieved Rule S. Samantha Since Solutions, Supreme The Tulsa, US Upon VitalBook _Abercrombie a able about accommodations accordance accounts, accusing addition administrative after against agency agreed aimed all allowed and anti-discrimination any any, appeals appearance applicants applied applying are as ask associated assumed at based basis. be because been behalf, black business called calls can case category. certain circuit clashed clothing code? collegiate cologne company company, company. company’s comply conflicts consulting consumers consumes court criteria. culture decision definitely described did discriminate discriminated discrimination disqualified distinct. district dress dress. due during décor either employees employers employment enforcing entire especially even favored federal females figure” file. fit floor for from gave going guidelines has hats have head headscarf hear her her. high hijab hire hire, hired hiring holds however http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/02/abercrombie-supreme-court_n_5923698.html http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/supreme-court-hear-employment-housing-cases/ http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/oct/02/supreme-court-abercrombie-fitch-hijab-religious-bias-muslim-headscarf if in inability includes indicate initially interview interviewed interviewer interviewing is its job jock judge laws limited. look. low majority makeup males manager manager, manager- meet most muscular nail needed not of old, old. on one onto opportunity or over overpowering p part-time past policy policy. policy.” policy” position practicing provocative, reasons reasons, reasons. received recommended recorded refused refusing religion religious responsible retailer retailer, reversed rights ruled sales scarf score sense she shop short since sized smaller smell standards statements store store. style” sue sued tell terms that the their they this though tight time time, to told treated typical upon very walking was wear were which who with without woman woman. wore work work. worker worn years ‘Religious “appearance “classic “hats” “look “model “models”. “model”,