Mathematical Modeling Helicopter Antisubmarine OperationsSummary The purpose of this report was to determine whether the effectiveness of the antis
Mathematical Modeling Helicopter Antisubmarine OperationsSummary The purpose of this report was to determine whether the effectiveness of the antis
# #s (MOE) (Using (knots) (lbs (lbs) (min) (nm) (nm^2) + 0.23 0.26 0.43 0.50 0.58 0.75 0.88 1 1-(1-P(Kss)^n), 1. 1.00 10.00 100 100.00 1033.33 11.67 1200.00 133.33 1416.67 16.67 17% 17%, 183.33 193.33 2 2. 2.00 20 20.00 200.96 230.79 283.33 2850 2850.00 3 3. 3.00 3.50 30 30.00 3100 35.00 38.47 384.65 4 4. 4.00 40.00 400.00 427.39 433.33 5 5. 5.00 50 50%. 50.00 50.24 502.40 583.33 6 6. 6.00 633.33 7 7. 75 75.00 8 8. 800.00 833.33 87% 872.22 93.33 966.67 = A ADCAP ASW Action After An Analysis Anti-submarine Antisubmarine Area As Assumptions At Available B CONTACT Capacity Circular Conclusions Consumption Contact Cruising Data Detection Determine Distance Effectiveness Emergency Enemy Even Existing Figure Flight From Fuel Goals Helicopter However, If In Information Initially, Into Introduction It Kill LBS Limiting MAXIMUM MILES Mathematical Max Maximum Measure Model Modeling Navy Needed Once Operations Our P(Kill PAYLOAD Payload Performance Probability Problem Rack Radius Reserve SH-60 SH-60's SH-60. Search Sensitivity Several Simply Since Sonobuoy Sonobuoys Speed States Submarine Summary TO TORPEDOES Testing That The Therefore, This Time To Today's Torpedo Torpedoes Total Traveled Travelled Type Typical Unfortunately, United Using We Weight a above absolute accounted accuracy actual added added. additional addressed admittedly advanced advantage affected airborne all allowable also always an analysis analysis, analyze analyzing and anti-submarine antisubmarine appearing approximation are area area. areas as asset assigned assumed assumptions: at attacked available away based be bearing became becomes becoming began being below: between both buoys, but by calculate can cannot capable capacity carriage carriage. carried carried. carry carrying case, cases, change changed: choice circle clear combat come concluded conclusion. consisted consistent constant constant, contact contact's continuously could count create creating critical data data, datum datum. deadly decided decision. defined defining depended depends deployed deployment detected detection detection, detection. determine determining develop developed developing did diesel differ differs: direction disadvantage distance distances distances, distribution, do drop drops during each effective effectiveness efficiency. eight end, enemy engine enhance enhanced enough equipment, equipped estimate even evident exact example) expectations. expected extra extremely fact, factor fifty figure figures final first five fleeting following for force force. forces foreign found four from fuel full function further gave give given goal great had has have heading helicopter helicopter, helicopter. helicopters here high higher highly how if important in in. inaccuracy. including increase increased increases ineffectiveness. inflated initial integral is it it's its kill killed killing knots. lbs, lbs. limit limited limiting listed littoral locating location) long long-range longer loses magnified majority many maximum may measure mile miles, miles. mission missions. model model, model. more most movement. much multiplied n nautical naval needed next nm) no nor normal not now, number obtained occur of on one only operating, operational optimistic. option or other our outside over overlap part particularly passage patrol patrolling pattern payload payload, payload. per perfectly performance periscope phase placed platform point. possibly poundage preferable. probability probability, probability. problem problem, proliferation proportionally protecting protection proved purpose purposes put put, question quiet, radius random range range, range. ranges ranges, reached reason recognized recommendation reducing reflected relayed remain remains report reserve, retains same scattered search seas. see seen sensitive sensitive, seventy-five short shorter shot should. sighted, significant significant. significantly silent simple simple. simplicity, simply since single six size so solely some somewhat son sonobuoy sonobuoys sonobuoys, sonobuoys. speed spotted station, step steps: study submarine submarine, submarines submarines. submerged supplied surface takes task technically tell tested testing testing, than that that, the their then there, thereby third this though threat threat, three three. through times to too took torpedo torpedo. torpedoes torpedoes, torpedoes. total towards traveled twenty two two. type ultimate ultimately, unable undoubtedly uniform unit units unknown, up updated us use use. used using variable variable, variables very visual warfare was way we weight were when where whether which while will with within words, working world. would
Mathematical Modeling Helicopter Antisubmarine Operations
Summary
The purpose of this report was to determine whether the effectiveness of the antisubmarine warfare helicopter would be enhanced if an additional torpedo would be added to its payload. As of now, the helicopter carried two torpedoes for its missions.
It was found that in developing the model, an estimate of the probability of killing a submarine was based on the distance to contact datum and the number of torpedoes carried. Limiting the size of the problem to fifty and seventy-five nautical miles, the question became how many torpedoes the helicopter carry should.
It was found to be more effective for the SH-60 anti-submarine helicopter to carry two torpedoes. Simply put, the kill probability drops too significantly at long ranges with three torpedoes. An 87% drop in kill probability between two and three torpedoes is undoubtedly very significant. However, kill probability at short ranges differ by only 17%, and remain high while carrying both two and three torpedoes.
Unfortunately, our naval forces cannot always count on enemy submarines