& (1986) (1988) (1989).Consent (1994), (1998) (2) (2001) (2003). (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (3) (4) (5)make (6) (BMA (Beauchamp (Bentham (Brazier (Chaloner (Department (Dimond (DoH (DoH, (Hendrick (ICN (Lowsden (Maclean (Mason (McGuire (McHale (Merlo (NICE (NMC (Parekh, (Parker (Pocock (Rodger (Rodgers (Stauch (Tingle (Tschudin (Videbeck , ,Hendrick ,beneficence, ,by ,dignity ,its ,justice ,nature, ,non ,nonmaleficence ,race ,sex, ,that ,the .A .An .Autonomy .Consent .Contrary .For .In .Nurses .Section .The .This 1 1.Ethics 112, 16 17 1748-1932 1806-1873 1969 1989 1989) 1989, 1989.Also 1996) 2.2 2.In 2000). 2000).This 2000,NMC 2001). 2001).Although 2001).The 2002) 2002).However 2002).In 2003) 2003). 2003).For 2003).In 2004) 2004). 2004).However 2005). 2005).This 2006) 2006). 2006).It 2006).The 2006, 2007) 2007). 2008) 2008).The 2019). 3.9 3.Consent 47 5.Identify : :the AC Act Act( After Aiken Area As Authority Authority. Autonomy Bristol Capacity Care Chadwick Chaloner Charter Charter: Child Children Children, Children’s Childress Clinical Code Consent Consultation Convention Cooke Council Crib DECISION Danny Danny, Danny’s Decision Decisions Deontological Deontology Dickenson Dimond Ensure Essence Ethical Ethics European Excellence Failure Family For Framework Fraser From Gallagher Gillick Good Griffith Grub He Health Health, House However However, Hurley I Ibid If In Infirmary Inquiry, Institute International It Justice Kennedy Laurie Law Legal Lords Lords. MAKING Maclean Maternity McGuire( Mental Midwifery Mills NHS NMC NMC( National Nations Nonmaleficence Nordam Norfolk Nurse Nurses Nursing Other PROCESS Patients People Rational Recently Reform Renee Report Respect Rights Role Royal Service Services Sometimes State Tadd The Therefore These They This Tingle To Treatment UK, United Utilitarian Utilitarianism Videbeck West Wisbech With Wrong Young a ability able about above accepting account accountable accurate achieving acknowledged. act acting action actions acts addressed adult adults advice advocate advocates affecting affects against age age-related age. aged agree agreed agreeing agreement aims al all allow allowed alongside also although always an analysed. analysis analyze and and, another anxiety any appendix apply approach appropriate are areas argue arise around as aspects assertion asserts assess assessing assessment assignment assistance assumes at attached attempt attitudes authority automatically autonomous autonomy autonomy. avoid avoiding aware awareness backed balance based bases basis be bearing because been before behalf being beliefs believe believed below benchmarking beneficence beneficence. beneficial benefit benefits benefits. best between bodily body both breaking by came can cannot capable capacity capacity. care care, care. cared caring case cases, category cause challenged challenging characteristics charges child child, child-centered children children, children. children16 children’s child’s choice choice. choices choosing cited civil claims clarifies clause client client. clients clients(Davies client’s clinical clinical, closely co-operation code colleagues come commission commonly communication community. comparing, competence competent competent, complex( comprehend concept concepts concerned concerning conclude concurs conducive conduct conferring confidence conflicting consent consent. consequences, consequences. consider considered considers consistent consultations continue contraceptive cornerstone correct costs. could course court courts criminal criteria critical cultural data date deal dealt death. deceived decide deciding decision decision. decisions decisions. decisions; declined deemed defensive defined definition deliver demands demonstrated depth design determine detrimental developing development developmental diagnosis dignity dignity, dignity. dilemma dilemma, dilemmas dilemmas. disabilities disciplinary discrimination discusion disorganized divided do do. document documentation. does done down duress. duties duty dying, each easily economic education effectiveness effects(Shaw efficiency eight either emotional emotions. emphasised empower encourage encourages encouraging enough enshrined ensure entirely entitled environment environment, environment. equal equally equated equivalent era, essence essential, established et ethical ethics evaluate even every evidence-based examines example executed exercising experience experiences explains exploration explored exploring exposed facilitate facilities fairly fairness fall far favour feelings felt first. focuses followed following for forward found framework free freedom from fully further future, girls give given givers gives good good. government greater greatest growing guidelines had harm harmful has haste have he health healthcare heard held her high highlighted highly his hospital hospitalised how idea identified identify, if ill implications improve in incapable included includes including incompetent. incorporated independence individual individual’s inflict influenced information information, information. informed informs insists instance institutionalised instruments integrity, integrity. intelligently intentionally interest interest, interests interests(BMA interests. interests; international into intuition investigation. involve involved involved. involvement involving is issue issues it judge justice justice, justice. keep key kind knowledge, laid language law lawsuits lead learning legal legally legislation legislation. lengthy level levels: life life, likely links literally litigation litigation. lives local looked made maintains make making maleficence marital matter may meaning means medical members mentally met might mind minimise modern modesty moral morally more multidisciplinary must national nature need needed. needs needs. negative negatives new no non-interference non-maleficence nonmaleficence nonmaleficience not notions number nurse nurses nurses’s nursing obligation obligations observed obtain obtaining occur of offered offered. offers often old. omission on one one’s only open operated operation opinion opinions opposed opposing options or order other others others. other’s out outcome over-analysed own pain. parental parenthood. parents parents. part participate participation parties pass past paternalism paternalist paternalistic patient patients patients. patient’s people people, permitted person person. personal persons perspective perspectives places pointed policy population position positive positives possessed possible power practical practice practice, practice-based practice. practices, practitioner practitioners preferences. preferred prejudices present previously principle principles priory privacy procedures proceedings, process professional professionals prohibit promote promoting promotion proposed protect protected protecting protection protects protocols protocols. provide provided providing public purpose qualities quality raises rather rational reach reaching reasons receive recognition recognizing recommendations referred refers reflecting reflection reflection, refusal refuse refused regard regarded regarding regularly. regulatory relate related relating relation relevant relies relieve religion represent require requirement requires resolve resolved.. respect respect, respecting respects responsibilities responsibility rests result results retain retained right right, rightness rights rights, rights-based risk risk. risks role ruling safe safety say says scattered, scenario scientific section seek self self-determination self-determination, self-rule. service services sets shall share sharing shift shifted should sick side significance significant since situation situations. six social social, solution solutions some special specialist staff stages: standards state statement states stating status statutory step stipulates strive subjects such suggested support supported supports surgery take taken team. tender tension test than that the their them them. then theories theory there these these. they this those three through time, to toolkit toward towards trained training treat treating treatment treatment. trial trust two unable uncertain under understand understood unintentionally(Videbeck unnecessary up upon used uses utilitarian v. valid view viewed views violation voices voluntarily vulnerable vulnerable. was way weigh weighting welfare well wellbeing were what when where whether whey which while who whom will wishes with with. within without working would wrong wrongness years you young your ‘Fraser’ ‘Gillick’