& (1995) (2001) (2002). (2003) (Adams (Banks, (Blackmore, (Blakemore, (Direct (Elder-Woodward, (Thompson (Times12).pdf (Topps, (Training (eds) (not (pg 16th 1989). 1990 1996 2001), 2001). 2002 2002). 2003), 2003). 2005 2018). 2019 2019). 2020 2nd 34) 3rd A Act Adams Adams, Adults All An Anti-discriminatory Audit August Banks, Basingstoke, Blackmore, Buckingham, Care Carers Challenging Commission Community Critical Critically Dehumanizing Discrimination Ed. Elder-Woodward, Equality: Ethics Farewell Generally Griffiths However, Initiatives: Introduction. It J LTD, Leeds London Macmillan Making Many NHS NVQ National Negative Neil New Occupational Of Often, Open Oppression Organisation Palgrave Palgrave. Payments) Personal Policy: Practice Press Promoting Recent References Report Retrieved Robert S Sense Service Services Services, Social Some Standards The This Thompson Thompson, Topps, Training University Until Value-for-money Values Viewing We Welfare Work. York, a ability able about above accepted adult aforementioned again against. age al al, alike. all allows also an and another; anti-discriminatory anti-oppressive any are areas argued arrange as as: assisting” assumption at attribution authorities avoiding aware awareness barriers base base, based basis; bastard. be became become behaviours. being biological brought by can care care-receivers cared carer carers carers, case characteristics, check choice, class, co-ordination collaboratively, community consider considerable consideration considered constraints constructs consumer-led; consumers. context, continually contracted controlled core countered create creates critically crucial debrief decision-making defined degrading dehumanizing demeaning dependence dependent described direct disability disability, discourse discriminated discrimination discrimination. discriminatory discussion. disempowering disempowerment disparate, disparities distribution document. economic effects. elements emphasized empower empowering enabling encouraging engage engagement ensure ensuring equal esteem et example exercise expertise facilitating favored features field financial find focal focus followed for forces; forward frame friends/family, from: funding gender, give given group groups; handled. handling”. hardship have health hold home how http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/elderwood/CCPS identified identify identity. imbalance impaired impairment impairment-focused) impairments implication implicit implied important in individual individual, individuals infantilising injustice intellectual involved is issue issued issues it its jargon k key key, knowledge, language lead less levels liase life. likely live local look loss lots mainstream maintain make makes managers/social many market material mature, may maybe mean medical medicalised mental messages mind minimise model model; monitoring more much multitude must mystery necessary. need needs needs. negative new non-discriminatory not now. object of often on on. once one open opened opportunities opportunity oppression oppression, oppressive option or or, orientation, other out over own package. paid paper3 part partaking particularly past pathology, pay payments people person perspective perspective; physically placing plan plans point political position positive possible, potential power powerful power” practice practices practices, practitioners pressure, prevented principle private problem problem, procedure promote providers. providing purchasing qualification. questions quickly race, raised reactions real received. recently, referred reflect reflected reflective regard regarding regular regularly regulations, relates relation remains remove repeat report reported require required requires residential resource-led resources resources. resources; result run says secondary sector seen sense service services setting sexual should significant situations skills so social social, societal solution-focused solutions some sought staff stance standard state status step steps still strategies strengths. stressful, such suggests superior supervision support tackled take taken term terms. that the their them themselves there therefore they this those through to to, towards traditionally trained training traits treatment ultimately understand ungrateful up upon use used user user, user. users users, users. user’s using utilizing value values variables. variety very voluntary vulnerable was were where whereby which who widely wider will with with, within work work. workers working, – “Inhuman “closed” “demedicalised” “live” “manual “moving “professionals”