TENDENCY OF LEFT AND RIGHT BRAIN DOMINANCE DETERMINING SEATING PREFERENCES Right and left-brain hemisphere bias was studied in participants that were asked to choose a seat within given conditions. Th
TENDENCY OF LEFT AND RIGHT BRAIN DOMINANCE DETERMINING SEATING PREFERENCES Right and left-brain hemisphere bias was studied in participants that were asked to choose a seat within given conditions. Th
& (+4.4), (-2.6)- (1 (1975) (1975), (1992) (2000) (2006) (2006), (2010) (2010), (2014) (2014), (Gur (Okubo,2010) (Weyers (not . .Both 0.6. 16 18. 1975). 1F90 2006).These 4.8. 5.4, A AND According All Although An As BRAIN Based Brock Consequently, DETERMINING DOMINANCE Discussion Eilas Evidence Five Functional Further Furthermore, Future Gilbert Gur Gur, Harms Harms, In Individuals It Karev LEFT Left Leftward Luck Marshalek Measures Methods Milnik, Mueller OF Okubo Okubo(2010) PREFERENCES Participants Pauli Possibly Previous Prior Procedure Psychology RIGHT Reese Results Right SEATING Seventeen Students Studies Subsequently, The There Therefore, These This University Visual Weyers Weyers, When Wysocki a about acknowledge acknowledged actions. activity. affect affected affecting affects aim al, al. all also altered always an analytical and any approach approach. are areas artistic as asked aspect assessing associated assumed asymmetry at atmosphere. attending attitude available avoid back based be behavioral behaviour behaviour. being believes best between bias bias, bias. biology both brain brain. by calculating can captured causing center centre certain chance chance. chart choice choice. choices choices. choose choosing chose clearly conclude concluded concludes conclusion conditions conditions, conditions. conducted confirming confirms consistent contained content contrast, controls convey conveys correlates correlation corresponding could created creates creative current daily data data. day decisions decisions. depicted depression description despite diagrams difference different differently. direction directly discussed, distributing does dominance dominance. dominant drastic each effect effective eight either emotion emotional emotions emotions, emotions. enrolled ensures entry environment equal establish et evaluate evaluates evaluating evaluations even every everyday evident examined example excluded excludes exclusion exhibit exhibited; exhibiting exhibits expectation experience experience. experiment. explored expressed, external eye facilitate factor factors factors. favor favorable favored favors favoured favours feelings females) field. filling film finding findings findings, findings. five fluctuating for formulating four from from. functions. future genre given given. graphic had hand handed handers has have head health hearing hemisphere hemisphere. hemispheres how human hundred hypothesis hypothesised if image images impact implications in include inconclusive indicate indicated indicates indicating individual, individual. individuals individual’s influence influenced influences information information. internal interpret interpreted investigates involved is issues it it. judgement key knowledge knowledge. known lateral layouts learned learning lecture lecture. left left-brain left-side leftward less likely limitations limited literal lives logical looking low, made majority male map map, mathematical maximizes may mean mental mentioned mentioned, mimic mood more most motivated motivating motivation motor movement movements movers movie negativity, negativity. no not noted number observed obtaining occurs of on one one’s only opposed opposite optimal option or other our out outcome over overall page page. paper paper. part participants participants, participants. participant’s perceived perfect perform peripheral photo piece place placement platform population position positive possible possibly predicted predicted, predicts prefer preference preference. preferences preferences. preferred present present. presented prevails previous previously primarily prior process processed processes processing, produce prove proves provided questionnaire random randomly range real-life realizing receiving refers regardless related relation relative relevant represented represents research research, reservation responsible restrictions result resulted. resulting results results, results. reveal right right-handed right-side rightward room room. rooms. same sample. scenario scenarios scenarios. scientific score scores scoring screen seat seat. seating seats seats, seats. see select selecting selection selection. seminar sense. setting settings. several sheet short should showed shown side side, side. sight significance since sitting situation, six sketch society. sparks spatial specific states strategies student, students students) studied studies study study, study. subconsciously subjects such suggested suggesting suggests suitable support supported supported, supports tTENDENCY tasks. tend tendencies tendencies. that the theater theater, theater. theater; theatre their theory there therefore these they this thought thoughts three timing to took top topics total transmits turn turning two unaware undergraduate unsystematic use used uses using utilized validity variables varied variety ventilation. verbal view viewed. visual visualization. visualized vs was way we well well. were when where which while wider will with within without wo would
TENDENCY OF LEFT AND RIGHT BRAIN DOMINANCE DETERMINING SEATING PREFERENCES
Right and left-brain hemisphere bias was studied in participants that were asked to choose a seat within given conditions. The study predicted that individuals tend to exhibit a right bias when choosing a seat in a movie theater; and leftward bias when selecting a seat in the biology lecture. A total of 16 participants utilized a visual map to select a seat preference in either a movie theater or biology lecture. The study concluded right side bias indicates right brain hemisphere dominance when choosing a seat preference in the movie theater. Leftward bias was not observed in the biology lecture in the current study. The findings are consistent with previous research of right side bias, confirming dominant brain hemisphere has an overall influence on seating preference.
An individual’s seating choice is based on a several external and internal factors. There is a correlation between seating preferences and the environment that is not always acknowledged by the individual. The human approach is influenced by the way the left and right side of the