Ethical relativism is the stance  Ethical relativism is the stance that there are no moral codes, no moral wrongs or right. Right or incorrect is based on social customs. Ethical relativism suggests t

Ethical relativism is the stance  Ethical relativism is the stance that there are no moral codes, no moral wrongs or right. Right or incorrect is based on social customs. Ethical relativism suggests t

$0.69
Add To Cart

 Ethical relativism is the stance that there are no moral codes, no moral wrongs or right. Right or incorrect is based on social customs. Ethical relativism suggests that people’s morals are vibrant, subject to times and environment. Ethical relativism accommodates and enables the existence of several cultures and practices. It provides individuals the liberty to adapt and practice their interacted socially principles and cultures. This indicates that there is no static culture or principles. Morals depend on the society choices, technology, reasoning, feelings, experience, and rules to name a few aspects.

Morality is really vital since it holds the society together. The rationale of this paper is to explain the result of ethical relativism on the morality bond that brings the society together. In ethics, the notion that nothing is objectively wrong or right and that the meaning of right or wrong counts on the existing perception of culture, a private or history. The existence of morality is not relative to uniqueness.

Hence some of the relativists’ arguments are void. Ethical relativism is a knotty theory considering that there are numerous distinctions within cultures. People’s choices may not for all time be morally appropriate choices. Hence what is culturally acceptable may not constantly be morally right. Ethical relativism by definition is a premise that preserves that there are no normally accepted ethical codes. Ethical relativism is typically affected the dispute between right and wrong due to social and personal ethical relativism along with the natural law premise (Lukes, 2008).

Personal ethical relativism holds that different people have diverse moral beliefs. Social ethical relativism holds that different societies have distinct code of ethics. On the other hand, the natural law presumes that there is a general set of moral values that opposes ethical relativism; however