African American (Catholics) (and (let ) , 1904 Africa Africa, Africa. African Anglican, Applying As Bodies Bodies. Boniface Buddhism But Catholic Catholics Christian Christianity, Christianity. Chri

African American (Catholics) (and (let ) , 1904 Africa Africa, Africa. African Anglican, Applying As Bodies Bodies. Boniface Buddhism But Catholic Catholics Christian Christianity, Christianity. Chri

$0.69

! (Catholics) (and (let ) , 1904 Africa Africa, Africa. African Anglican, Applying As Bodies Bodies. Boniface Buddhism But Catholic Catholics Christian Christianity, Christianity. Christians Christians, Church Church; Churches Communalism Council Denomination Denomination, Denominations Denominations, Denominations; Dialogue Ecumenical Even For Genuine God God, Harmony His However, II, If In Interreligious Islam Islam, Islam. Islamic It Jews, Johannesburg Judaism, Just Laity Later Luther Magesa, Martin Most Muslims Neither, No On One Pope Protestant Qur’anic Rather, Religion Religionists Religions Religious Since Some South The These This To Traditional Turks, VIII Vatican What When Within Zziwa [40] [43] [44] [46] [48] [50] [the] a about above absolutism according action acts adherents affects agent alone alone, also although an and anyone apostolic appears application applied applying are as autonomy bad based basis be bedrock been begin beliefs believe belong belong. both but by can cannot case, catholic choices church churches churches, claim claims clear clergy cling communal communalism communalism, communalism. community community, community. community.” community”. complement. complementary complemented concerned, condemned considered constitutes contemptuous context context. continues contrary, counterparts countries courage customs damnation. definitely depend destruction determines dialogue dialogue, dialogue. disrupts distinct divided do does done doomed dropped e each earlier, easily ecumenism, ecumenist efficacy embedded embrace emphasis enables encounter, encountering, enhance enhances equal eternal every example, exclusivism, exercised expansion exploration extension, fact faith false far feeble festivals firmly first five for foundation four freedom freedom, freedom. from fully functioning fundamentalists fundamentalists, general genuine give good great. greatest harmony harmony, has have he heathen, her her, him hindering his hold holy, how idea identical if immoral, immoral. impedes impedes” implications implies impoverishes in inculcated indeed indifference individual individual, inseparable interrelationships interreligious into is is.” it it.” it; its it’s joined. just kill kind labels lacking laid. laity leading liberty license life life, like, link, listen[s] lives long makes making many mean meaningful means meant member members mentality. mindset missing moral morally movement much mutual mutual!), neither no nor not now obliged obstacles obvious of on on, one one; oneself, only or other others others. outside own participation particular people people. perdition.” person perspective philosophy place, platform precisely pride priests principle probably problems profess professes promotes properties provides punished. reaffirmed realization realized refusal refuse regard rejoices relationship. religions religious remain remission required respectively. result resulting revealed rewarded right, rightness rooted running salvation same saw says, says: searching see seen sees set several share share, shared. she should showed shows shrines side, since sins.” six smooth so society some something spite started still struggle.” such suffers teach teaches than that the their themselves. then then, there these these, they things this this, though three through to to. today tolerate traditional true two understood unify unreservedly up use vein, versa. verses, very vice wants. way way, we welfare well-being were what whatever when where whether which who will with within words, worldview worldwide would wrath wrong, wrongness yet “We “When “enhances “is “of “self” “self”. “those “what

Add To Cart

The fact that in African communalism, the individual is identical with the community does not mean that the individual does not have his or her freedom. Harmony is the bedrock of African communalism. The same harmony according to Magesa, “is [the] agent of freedom and is meant to enhance it.” [40] Within the context of African communalism, good acts resulting from individual choices are rewarded just as bad acts are punished. This shows that the individual, in spite of the emphasis on communal life, has his or her freedom.

However, freedom, as far as African worldview and by extension, African Religion is concerned, is not a license or liberty for one to do whatever one wants. Rather, it is “what enables a person to be fully who he or she is.” It is a freedom or autonomy that is exercised within a communal context. Since African communalism is rooted in complementary interrelationships and mutual harmony, it provides a basis for true interreligious dialogue. Applying African Communalism into the Religious Ecumenical Bodies in Africa for a Genuine Interreligious Dialogue

Ecumenical movement in Africa started precisely in Johannesburg in South Africa in 1904 with the Protestant churches that realized how much divided they were and started searching for a way to unify themselves. [43] Later on, some other Christian churches, like, Catholic and Anglican, joined. [44] The expansion continues today to embrace other religions other than Christianity. Most countries in Africa have now their own Ecumenical Bodies. But the result has not been great. As Zziwa says, “When one listen[s] to the contemptuous labels that several Catholic priests (let alone laity ! ) still use about their counterparts in Protestant Churches (and it’s probably mutual!), and when one sees the general