“THE ACCOUNTING PROFIT FIGURE IS SIMPLY A MEASURE OF THE TRUE PROFIT OF AN ORGANIZATION& (1978). (December (July (Kvaal (September (and (as (e.g. (they - 13, 1965): 1978) 1988, 2 2, 2009). .” DISCUSS.

“THE ACCOUNTING PROFIT FIGURE IS SIMPLY A MEASURE OF THE TRUE PROFIT OF AN ORGANIZATION& (1978). (December (July (Kvaal (September (and (as (e.g. (they - 13, 1965): 1978) 1988, 2 2, 2009). .” DISCUSS.

$1.00

& (1978). (December (July (Kvaal (September (and (as (e.g. (they - 13, 1965): 1978) 1988, 2 2, 2009). 2010)2. 2010. 2011 251-261 3, 4 599-605 A ACCOUNTING AN Accountancy Accounting Accounting, Although As Available Before Business By Choice Concepts Consequences, D. DISCUSS. Deegan Defining Differences Economic Education, Even FIGURE Financial Firstly For Forthcoming He Hines Hines, However I IFRS IS If In Instead International It J. Journal Just Kvaal MEASURE McGraw-Hill Nobes, OF ORGANIZATION.” Once Organizations PROFIT Policy Profit Research, Review Rise Ruth S. SIMPLY SSRN: Secondly Society, THE TRUE The Theory, There Therefore These This Unerman Unerman, W. Wagner Wagner, What With Zeff Zeff, a absence abundantly account accountant3. accountants accountants. accounting accounting. accounting.” accounting4. accounting: accounts accounts. add adopted all also always amongst an analysing and apply applying appropriate are aren’t argues article as assess assets.”1 at away based be becomes before. began being believed beneficial between bias black by calculated calculation can cannot can’t cash chair), challenged change clear close closer communicating company compromised concept conclusion consequences consider considered construct contribute conventions, correctly. could couldn’t countries country country. create created creating creations data decide deemed defects define defined defined. defines definitions depends describe described didn’t difference differences different differently. directly distance do do), does doesn’t doubt draws dropped. early economic entered era essentially even exactly, example examples exercise exist existence exists extent factors farther figure figure) figure. first five flaws flow. follow. for four frequently from fully general getting have held holes.” how however http://ssrn.com/abstract=1466693 idea identify ignored implications implications, improve, in increase individual into introduced introduced. introducing involved is is, is. issue issues it it. itself), itself, it’s judgement know lack later lead learned life like likely longer managers manner. may meaning measure measures mind module, module. much must naming ne need negative net neutral neutral. neutrality neutrality. no not notion number object object. objective objectively objectivity objects observe obtained of on once one only or order other out outcome outside over o“THE pages perceive perceptual perfect pointed possible practices profession. professional profit profit, profit. question. reaching real reality reality, reality; realize realized realized. really recognize reflects relative relevant relies return revenue revenue. revenue: rules same saw see seeing seemed seminar seminars. series serves setters setting several shown shows significant significant, simple six so social solid, something soon standard standards standards. standards.”5 states strange. studying substantive such surely surrounding systematic that the them. themselves then theory there therefore these they they’re thing thing. this three through time times to transactions true truly truth two underlying until uses using varies various vary vary, vol. was way ways we weaken what whatever when where whether which will would you your – ‘profits’ ‘revenue’, “As “We “What “a “true”

Add To Cart

“THE ACCOUNTING PROFIT FIGURE IS SIMPLY A MEASURE OF THE TRUE PROFIT OF AN ORGANIZATION.” DISCUSS.

In order to assess whether the accounting profit is a measure of the true profit it must first be shown that there is such a thing as true profit. If we decide there is, we then need to know what it is exactly, in order to assess the extent to which the accounting profit reflects this true profit figure. Before studying this module, I believed that the true profit was essentially the accounting profit calculated correctly. I saw profit as being a simple calculation that would always return the same figure.

As I didn’t realize the extent to which professional judgement is involved in reaching the profit figure I couldn’t identify the real issues surrounding the idea of the true profit. Instead I pointed out flaws in the concept of profit itself, for example that profit doesn’t consider cash flow. However as these flaws apply to true profit as much as accounting profit (they apply to the notion of profit itself), they’re not really relevant to the question.

I first learned that accounting profit and true profit could not be the same thing early in the module. Accounting profit draws directly on data from the accounts. The way these accounts are held is the outcome of applying various accounting rules and conventions, and at times relies on the professional judgement of individual accountants. Deegan and Unerman add that “As these rules change (as they frequently do), the same series of transactions will lead to different measures of ‘profits’ and net assets.”1 The accountin