&ump; (2001) (2007) (2017) (2018) (ISQC1) (Pfflugrath, 112 1’s 2 20 2019). A Also, Both Chen Chen, Concisely, Controls ETHICS Ethical For Hence, However, In International Ketchand Martinov-Bennie Moreover, Morrid On People Pfflugrath, Pflugrath Pflugrath, Quality Shafer Shafer, Shafer’s Standard The There Unitary Whereas a abandoned abilities absence academic accountant accountants accountants. accountants’ accountants’’ accounting accounting. affect affecting aggressive agreement aim aims al al. al., al.’s all almost al’ al’s an analysis analyze and appears appropriate are argument arguments arguments. articles articles, articles. as assertions assurance at audit auditing auditors auditors. auditors’ authors. autonomy based basing be been behavior behavioral behaviors. being belong best better biased both business businesses. but by case cases choose claims client clients client’s code codes companies compatible conclude concluded conclusion conducted confidence considerations considerations”. consistent contrary contrast data decision decisions dependent depends depth details determinants, different dilemma discretion discussed discussed. discussion diversified do does economic employees end enough environment et. et.al., ethical ethics ethics, every evident exercise exercised existing experience factor factors fairly fields fields. financial find findings firms first five for fouBUSINESS four gives graduated. had hand, has have help hence, homogeneity however, if ignore impact impacts implement in inappropriate included independence independent indicates indicating influence influenced information information. insight intensity intentions. interest is it journals judge judged judgment judgment, judgments judgments, judgments. knowledge lack leading leaves like literature literature. made major majority making makings may methodology moral more most much new norm norms not number of on one or orders. organizational organizations other paper papers participants past people perceptions personal persuasive policies population portion positively positively. potential practices preferences, presence pressure prevail produced professional professionals professionals. provide provides providing public public. quality r rather reader reasonable regard, regulations related reliability reliable rely reporting, requirements research research. researches respondents result resulted resulting results results, review review. right sample scenarios second set several should significant similar situations six skills. social sources space standardization stated straightforward strong students students’ studies study study, such suggest support supporting survey, technical terms than that the their there this three to today’s together. trust two under understanding unethical, unlike up upon used utilitarian validity values values, values. violated we weakness where which who wide with within work working years’ “The “auditors’